|
|
The headline above is an exaggeration of course, but before going into my latest ramblings I first had to get your attention. This is going to be, possibly, the most eventful ICSC show weve had in years, not because the show will be great or horrible, but because it "might" be a non-event. What do I mean by that??? It means nothing good or bad will occur. Caution will prevail and to a large extent, "no decision" by the attendees will become the "norm." Less deals will be started, less leases signed, less development, less brokerage, less financing. Of course, some deals will be started in Vegas as will new development and financing but a lot less than last years show. But lots of networking will occur as everyone tries to figure out where their next buck is coming from. Yes, there will be mucho retailers, developers, brokers and financial companies showing up in large numbers (in all probability, not as many as last year, but overall attendance will still be among the top numbers any ICSC show has ever attracted). But were in uncertain times partly because were a "mature" industry. (God, that makes me feel old. When I started 31 years ago, not only were we not mature, we were practically adolescents with no adult supervision or guidance. We ran with scissors and played with matches but we were young and didnt know any better. Now the "adults" who supervise us are bean counters, and theyre no fun to play with.) When times get tough, "mature" industries tend to make thee kinds of decisions: none, minimal and ridiculous. Retailers in particular are guilty of this. When business is good on Monday, they want to open 22 new stores. When business is bad on Wednesday, they want to close 37. Real long-term planning isnt their strength. Especially when youre reporting to Wall Street and the only concern is ROI, its better to be safe than sorry. No decision means they cant blame you for making a bad decision, since none was made. Now the predicament were in wasnt caused by the bean counters (then again, they wont be much help getting us out of trouble either). But its a helpless feeling when all we can do is complain about the economy and pray the government can solve the problem. (You know were in real trouble if we "need" the government). It was more fun, and probably -- no, definitely -- more profitable when the industry was full of entrepreneurs who gambled it all, very often on the equivalent of a throw of the dice. Unfortunately, most of em have either retired, died or become chairmen of their respective companies. They are no longer involved in the day to day operations, often out of touch with both what the public wants and what will work in retailing and real estate today. These original "creator-types" are the exact kind of individuals we need, now more than ever before, to jump start retailing and real estate. "Come Back to the Five and Dime, Jimmy Dean, Jimmy Dean." Now dont misinterpret what Im saying. I do NOT believe the slowdown will be anywhere near the disaster of the late 80s and early 90s. Were in much better shape now than we were then. HOWEVER, because of the consolidation of retailers and developers, theres little excitement or originality, even in the "good times," to make the industry grow at any decent clip. With a slowdown, it gets worse, but I do believe well have a slowdown, not a recession, in the coming months. And thats good. For the next six to 12 months well just have to work harder, market better and become more "creative" (whatever that means). In all probability, some of the founders of the various companies who pioneered our industry, whether in development or retailing, will come out of semi- retirement. The "white haired," recession-experienced executives that the bean counters (or "suits" or "top management," pick the term you like) have not been paying much attention to for the last six years, while the economy was flying high on that great drug called the Internet, will either once again come into positions of power or leave to start their own companies. (Didnt Colonel Sanders of KFC fame start the company at 65?) The old-timers will make a buck, prove theyre not washed up just yet and help put us back on the right track again (Truth, justice and the American Way). Im not saying a young person cant start a retail chain or become a major developer, but experience has merit and this is not a time for amateurs. Even if the slowdown is short-lived, retailing and real estate are changing and we dont seem to have many leaders that can keep up with all these changes or, more importantly, even understand what these changes mean. On a different but related topic, theres a story inside this issue of The DealMakers on the current state of the industry and what developers think are the current problems, solutions and causes. One developer claimed the biggest problem is we (as a nation) are over- retailed and its all the retailers fault for opening too many stores. Thats like the john complaining about the hooker wanting money. It takes two to tango. For every retailer opening a new store, there were developers, brokers and financial institutions begging em to do it with them. Its our industrys fault if were over-retailed. BUT I personally dont think the problem is too much retailing, it is too much crumminess and sameness in retailing. (Boring, boring, boring) Most retailers look alike, think alike and carry the same merchandise at the same price points. When theres a TJ Maxx next to a Ross store and they are carrying 70% identical clothing, that isnt too much retailing, its too much boredom. The buyers for these companies should be ashamed of themselves. Even the "better" department stores such as Neimans and Nordstroms are beginning to look like identical twins. We need different "retailing," not copycats. Of course, we tried "different" retailing with entertainment and lifestyle centers and you saw what that accomplished. But I think the problem with the entertainment and lifestyle centers was they are "niche concepts" and the niche was over-built, which seems to be typical for our industry. Moving on... Ann was talking to a developer about a broker they both know and asked why the broker never returned any of her calls. The developer explained that the broker suffered from "retailitis." Ann asked what that is and was informed the broker in his former life was a retailer, so he developed the habit of never returning calls. I thought that was cute but you would think that even a broker would have enough common sense to understand hes no longer in a position of power and if he does want to make money, returning calls would benefit him. But I notice thats a common problem when a real estate rep for a retailer switches sides and becomes either a broker or landlord. They, at least temporarily, live under the illusion that their retailer "friends" will return calls and they foolishly think because they were once confidants with these retailers they will be trusted and therefore deals will be made in their centers. Foolish, foolish boys. They still havent learned that its the second name on the name tag that counts, not the first. There also appears to be a misconception in our industry that if you previously represented a retailer, youre now better qualified to be a broker/developer. Why?? Because they know how a retailer thinks? BULL, it doesnt take much to understand good real estate. Thats easy, and a good lease negotiator is a good lease negotiator. Now Im not saying people shouldnt or cant switch sides but a "good real estate person is a good real estate person no matter who theyre representing. Parting thoughts... Whether we go back to "booming" times tomorrow or if we have a slowdown for the next year, this Vegas show is the best opportunity of the year for you to network, learn and hopefully start some deals... Good Luck.
P.S. Dont forget to drop by our booth at 667 Sixth Avenue on Monday from 4:30 p.m. on for the annual RD Management/TKO Beer Bash... lots of networking and even more fun.
|